The Holy Nights in Ivan Shmelev's Description: Mythopoeics of Childhood and the Ontology of Celebration

Ivan Sergeyevich Shmelev's (1873–1950) approach to the theme of the Holy Nights in his late, émigré works ("The Lord's Summer," 1927–1948; individual stories) is not just a nostalgic depiction of pre-revolutionary life but a complex artistic-theological reconstruction of a holistic world order. The Holy Nights in Shmelev are not just a stage in the calendar but a time itself, becoming a sacred space where the profound connection between life, faith, nature, and the national soul is revealed through childhood perception.

1. The Chronotope of the Holy Nights: Time as Celebration and Eternity.

Shmelev creates a sense of stretched, meaningful time. The Holy Nights for the boy Vanya are not just the days between Christmas and Epiphany but "celebrations of celebrations," a special state of the world:

Cyclicity and rhythm: Time moves not linearly but in a circle of sacred events — from the stillness and anticipation of the vigil to the wild "frightful nights" and the purifying Baptism. Each day has its liturgical and everyday code.

Sacralization of everyday life: During the Holy Nights, all life becomes a ritual. Even the most ordinary actions — feeding livestock, cleaning the house, preparing food — are filled with symbolic meaning. "The world stood still in anticipation of the Miracle, and everything in it became a sign of this Miracle."

Blurring of boundaries: As in folk tradition, the Holy Nights in Shmelev are a time when boundaries are blurred: between the world of the living and the dead (memories, prayers), between social classes (the poor and carolers come to the house), and between the earthly and the heavenly (the sky "opens up," the stars "speak").

2. The Semantics of Celebrations: From Christmas to Epiphany.

Shmelev carefully describes the internal logic of each stage of the Holy Nights, showing them as a unified liturgical year in miniature:

Christmas: The climax of family, warm, "domestic" holiness. The smell of the Christmas tree, wax, tangerines; the feeling of the "Christmas miracle" as an intimate family event. The main thing here is the Incarnation of God in the world, and therefore the world becomes cozy and inhabited.

"Frightful" nights (before the Day of Vasiliy and Epiphany): A time of playful, carnival inversion. Divinations, masked figures, "frightful" stories. Shmelev does not condemn this "sinful" side from the perspective of strict churchliness but shows it as a folk "relief," a natural reaction to the tension of the sacred period. The irrational depth of the world is understood through the child's fear and curiosity.

Epiphany (Baptism): The climax and completion. Purification and order. Frost, the sanctification of water, the solemn cross procession to the Jordan. If Christmas is God entering the house, then Epiphany is God appearing to the whole world, sanctifying the elements. A symbol of the victory of light and structure over the holy night chaos.

3. Gastronomy as Liturgy: The "feast of being."

Food in Shmelev's Holy Nights is one of the main ways of experiencing the celebration and a sign of God's abundant world.

The Vigil: A fasting, but exquisite meal ("sokolnik," fish, broths) — an ascetic joy of anticipation.

Christmas: An explosion of festive abundance: pork with porridge, "pork" delicacies, goose with apples, mountains of pies. This is not gluttony but an eucharistic feast, an expression of gratitude for the Incarnation. Food becomes a material expression of joy.

St. Vasiliy's Eve: The mandatory pork head — a tribute to folk tradition and St. Vasiliy the "pork eater," a symbol of prosperity. Through tastes and smells, Shmelev conveys the corporality, the fleshly joy of the Orthodox celebration, alien to spiritual asceticism.

Interesting fact: In the chapter "The Holy Nights," Shmelev masterfully describes the ritual of "славление" (similar to carols). It is important that Christ is praised not by professional singers but by "sweater boys" — simple workers from the factory. Their singing is "unharmonious, thick, rough," but it has "such power that it takes your breath away." For Shmelev, this is a key moment: true faith and celebration live not in ideal aesthetics but in spontaneous, powerful, folk vitality, which is the true "beauty of God's world."

4. The Child's Perspective: The world as a miracle.

Perceiving the Holy Nights through the eyes of a child is not just a literary device but a theological position. "If you do not turn and become like children, you will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven" (Matt. 18:3).

Irreducibility of "holy" and "frightful": The child experiences both awe at the Christmas service and the horror of Christmas divinations with equal intensity. For him, the world is whole and animate.

Trust and acceptance: Adults may be skeptical about omens or masked figures, but the child believes unconditionally in the reality of the miracle, in the conversations of animals on Christmas night, in the prophetic power of dreams. This faith is the foundation of Shmelev's depiction of the world.

Perceptibility of the mystery: The mystery of the Incarnation for Vanya is not abstract — it is in the smell of the pine tree, the taste of the "sokolnik," the prickly frosty air of the Baptism. The spiritual is understood through the material.

5. The Émigré Context: The Holy Nights as a lost paradise and a spiritual homeland.

Shmelev began writing "The Lord's Summer" in émigré, far from Russia. Therefore, his Holy Nights are not only a memory but also an act of creative "resurrection" and affirmation.

Nostalgia as creativity: The detailed, almost ethnographic description of rituals and customs is an attempt to preserve the lost world in words, to make it indestructible.

"Russia, which we lost" appears not in political but in ontological terms — as a space of harmony between God, nature, and man. The Holy Nights become a symbol of this lost harmony, its quintessence.

A spiritual alternative: Against the backdrop of chaos and atheism in the modern world depicted by the author, Shmelev's Holy Nights offer a model of an organized, meaningful, bountiful existence.

Conclusion.

The Holy Nights in Ivan Shmelev are a total artistic-religious cosmos constructed according to the laws of childhood memory and Orthodox world perception. It is a world where:

Life and being are inseparable (liturgy continues at the table, prayer in everyday work).

Folk culture and churchliness form a living synthesis (the praise of Christ by sweater boys, Christmas games next to prayer).

Time becomes not linear but sacred-cyclical, which contrasts with the historical catastrophism of the 20th century.

The main witness is the child, whose perception becomes a tuning fork of authenticity and a metaphor of the saving faith.

Thus, Shmelev creates not just a description of celebrations but a mythopoeic utopia of "Holy Russia," where the Holy Nights serve as its ideal temporal model. This is an attempt to return the lost time — the time when God was "at home" in the human world, and the world was in God. In this context, Shmelev's Holy Nights become a powerful act of resistance to spiritual decay and the affirmation of eternal, rooted in faith and tradition, foundations of human existence.

Permanent link to this publication: