Denmark during World War II and the Holocaust: A Controversial Reality

Introduction: A Unique Occupation Regime

Denmark was occupied by German forces on April 9, 1940, as part of Operation Weserübung. However, the Danish case became unique in the history of Nazi occupation in Europe. Until August 1943, Denmark maintained formal sovereignty, a functioning parliament, a government led by Social Democrat Thorvald Stauning, an army, and even King Christian X. This special status, known as the "model of collaboration" or "policy of conciliation," defined the country's specific position and influenced the fate of Danish Jews.

The "1940-1943 Model": Collaboration and Compromise

The German command was interested in maintaining the Danish economy as a source of agricultural products (meat, butter) and uninterrupted industrial operations. Denmark received the status of a "model protectorate." In exchange for political loyalty and economic supplies to Germany, Danish authorities retained control over internal affairs. In the first years of occupation, there was no martial law introduced in Denmark, no racial laws in their German version, and the small German administration barely interfered in everyday life.

Interesting fact: King Christian X, according to a widespread but historically unverified legend, supposedly wore a yellow Star of David as a sign of solidarity with Jews. There was never a real decree on wearing stars in Denmark. However, the king did exert private pressure on the government to protect Jewish citizens, and his daily horseback rides through Copenhagen without heavy security became a symbol of Danish tranquility and dignity.

The Turning Point of 1943: From Collaboration to Resistance

The situation changed sharply in the summer and autumn of 1943. Discontent with the occupation grew, sabotage incidents increased, and German military defeats at Stalingrad and in Africa changed the strategic picture. On August 29, 1943, German authorities presented the Danish government with an ultimatum demanding the introduction of capital punishment for saboteurs and stricter measures. The government refused and was dissolved. German Reich Commissioner Werner Best declared a state of emergency. The Danish fleet was partially scuttled by its own crews to prevent it from falling into German hands. A new phase began — the period of open resistance.

The rescue operation for Jews: a collective achievement and its reasons
The most famous page in Danish Holocaust history was the rescue of the overwhelming majority of the Jewish population in October 1943. Having received information from German diplomat George Ferdinand Duckwitz about the impending raid at night from October 1 to 2, the Danish underground, with the support of many ordinary citizens, organized an unprecedented operation.

For several weeks, about 7200 Danish Jews and 700 of their non-Jewish relatives were secretly transported by fishing boats across the Great Belt to neutral Sweden, which agreed to accept them. About 470 Jews fell into the hands of the Nazis and were deported to the Theresienstadt ghetto. Notably, thanks to constant pressure from Danish authorities and the Red Cross, most of these prisoners survived the war.

Unique Factors of Success:

The absence of deep antisemitism: There was no mass Jewophobia in Danish society. Jews (less than 0.5% of the population) were well integrated, considered Danish citizens of Jewish faith.

Civil disobedience: Thousands of people participated in the operation, from police officers warning about raids to doctors hiding people in hospitals, and ordinary fishermen risking their lives.

The special status of Denmark: Even in 1943, the Germans acted here more cautiously than in the East, trying to avoid open violence and mass disturbances that could disrupt economic supplies.

Example: One of the fishing boats, "Egir," under the command of Erik Kroijer, made numerous dangerous crossings through the strait in a few nights, transporting hundreds of people. Similar stories were numerous. Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg, who saved Jews in Budapest, was later inspired by the Danish example.

The Dynamics of Memory and Historical Assessments

The historiography of the Danish war period has gone through several stages:

The post-war myth of a "united people-resister," where emphasis was placed on the heroism of the rescue of Jews and the Resistance movement, while the period of collaboration from 1940 to 1943 was downplayed.

The critical revision of the 1960-80s, when historians began to study compromises and economic collaboration between Danish authorities and businesses with the Nazis.

The modern comprehensive approach, acknowledging both sides: pragmatic collaboration, which preserved the country from destruction, and mass civilian mobilization for the rescue of fellow citizens, made possible precisely due to the preserved structures of society.

Interesting fact: Danish Jews in Theresienstadt continued to receive food and medical supplies from the Danish government and the Red Cross. In 1944, to dispel rumors about death camps, the Nazis even allowed an inspection visit by a delegation of the Danish Red Cross and Danish officials to Theresienstadt, which was previously "cleaned up" and turned into a "model ghetto" for display. Although this visit was a propaganda action, it indirectly contributed to the survival of prisoners.

Conclusion: The Paradox of the Danish Experience

The history of Denmark during the war represents a paradox of pragmatism and humanism. On one hand, the country went to unprecedented compromises with the occupier, which allowed it to avoid casualties and destruction in the first years. On the other hand, it was precisely the preserved institutions of civil society, a sense of common responsibility, and national solidarity that allowed, at a critical moment, to organize an unprecedentedly effective rescue operation.

The Danish Holocaust case is unique not only for its low percentage of victims but also for demonstrating that even under total occupation and terror, active positions of society and the state can be a decisive factor in saving human lives. This experience continues to be studied as an example of how legal culture, social cohesion, and civic courage can withstand the machinery of destruction.
© elib.pk

Permanent link to this publication: